Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- the_paradoxes_of_copyright [2022/11/16 09:04] – [Wednesday: Paradoxes of machine creativity] fstalder
+++ the_paradoxes_of_copyright [2022/11/17 10:25] – [Thursday: Paradoxes of NFT: Ownership without Copyright] fstalder
@@ Line 92: / Line 92: @@
 **Jeff Koons**
-  * [[http://www.jeffkoons.com/artwork/banality|**Banality Series**]], 1988 [[https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artists/jeff-koons-2368/jeff-koons-banality-decadence-and-easyfun|Tate Modern]]
+  * [[http://www.jeffkoons.com/artwork/banality|Banality Series]], 1988 [[https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artists/jeff-koons-2368/jeff-koons-banality-decadence-and-easyfun|Tate Modern]]
   *   - Rogers vs Koons (1992)
    * [[http://www.artistrights.info/rogers-v-koons|Artist Rights: SIGNIFICANCE: ROGERS V. KOONS]]
@@ Line 106: / Line 106: @@
   * [[https://gagosian.com/exhibitions/2014/richard-prince-canal-zone/|"Canal Zone."]] Gagosian Galery, 2008
   * Patrick Carriou. 2000. [[https://www.amazon.com/Yes-Rasta-Perry-Henzell/dp/1576870731|Yes Rasta]].
-  * Prince vs. Carriou, The question of fair use [[http://www.herrick.com/publications/the-transformation-of-fair-use-after-prince-v-cariou |The ‘Transformation’ of Fair Use After Prince v. Cariou]] 2014
+  * 1. Trial: Leigh Anne Miller (2011). [[https://www.artnews.com/art-in-america/features/richard-prince-canal-zone-cariou-gagosian-lawsuit-58191/|Judge Rules Against Richard Prince in Appropriation Case]] Art in America (March 22)
+  * Appeal: Prince vs. Carriou, The question of fair use [[http://www.herrick.com/publications/the-transformation-of-fair-use-after-prince-v-cariou |The ‘Transformation’ of Fair Use After Prince v. Cariou]] 2014
   * Goldsmith, Kenneth. 2012. [[https://www.poetryfoundation.org/harriet-books/2012/04/richard-princes-latest-act-of-appropriation-the-catcher-in-the-rye|“Richard Prince’s Latest Act of Appropriation: The Catcher in the Rye.]]” Poetry Foundation
@@ Line 115: / Line 116: @@
-Harrison, Nate. 2015. “In The Wake of Richard Prince and Instagram, Revisiting Copyright Law, Appropriation and History.” AMERICAN SUBURB X (blog). June 4, 2015. https://americansuburbx.com/2015/06/in-the-wake-of-richard-prince-and-instagram-revisiting-copyright-law-appropriation-and-history.html
+Harrison, Nate. 2015. “[[https://americansuburbx.com/2015/06/in-the-wake-of-richard-prince-and-instagram-revisiting-copyright-law-appropriation-and-history.html|In The Wake of Richard Prince and Instagram, Revisiting Copyright Law, Appropriation and History.]]” AMERICAN SUBURB X (blog). June 4, 2015. [[https://web.archive.org/web/20120701012619/http://www.artandeducation.net/paper/the-pictures-generation-the-copyright-act-of-1976-and-the-reassertion-of-authorship-in-postmodernity|Initial publication, with footnotes]] 2012 via Waybackmachine
 Nate Harrison [[https://nkhstudio.com/pages/popup_amen.html|Can I Get An Amen?]], 2004
@@ Line 137: / Line 138: @@
 Warhol's Flowers:
-Patricia Caulfield [[https://nazmiyalantiquerugs.com/blog/andy-warhol-flowers-patricia-caulfield-hibiscus-blossoms/|Hibiscus Blossoms]] (1964) -- Andy Warhol [[https://www.moma.org/collection/works/71491|Flowers]] (1964) -- Elaine Sturtevant [[https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/15/t-magazine/most-important-contemporary-art.html|Warhol Flowers]] (1967) -- Cornelia Sollfrank.[[https://www.katevassgalerie.com/print?category=Cornelia%20Sollfrank| Anonymous Warhol Flowers]] (2004 -). [[https://nftnetart.officeimpart.com/exhibit/og-flowers|OG Flowers. 2010-2021]]
+Patricia Caulfield [[https://nazmiyalantiquerugs.com/blog/andy-warhol-flowers-patricia-caulfield-hibiscus-blossoms/|Hibiscus Blossoms]] (1964) -- Andy Warhol [[https://www.moma.org/collection/works/71491|Flowers]] (1964) -- Elaine Sturtevant [[https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/15/t-magazine/most-important-contemporary-art.html|Warhol Flowers]] (1967) -- Cornelia Sollfrank.[[https://www.katevassgalerie.com/print?category=Cornelia%20Sollfrank| Anonymous Warhol Flowers]] (2004 -). [[https://nftnetart.officeimpart.com/exhibit/og-flowers|OG flowers]] (2010-2021).
 [[https://artwarez.org/21.0.html|Legal Perspective]], 2004
@@ Line 170: / Line 171: @@
   * Open AI: https://beta.openai.com/playground
   * Deep AI: https://deepai.org/machine-learning-model/text-generator
+  * Inferkit Demo: https://app.inferkit.com/demo
   * SudoWrite: https://www.sudowrite.com
@@ Line 186: / Line 188: @@
 NFTs Explained: A Must-Read Guide to Everything Non-Fungible
 https://nftnow.com/guides/what-is-nft-meaning
+Financial Times: [[https://www.ft.com/content/df9f5795-2aaf-4088-a76e-304056db61ef|The FT Crypto Glossary]]
   * What is the blockchain? And why is it not Bitcoin?
@@ Line 208: / Line 212: @@
   * Lee Tzu Tung: Sailing in the Pirate Sea of Art
+Additional Material
+Dan Olsen: [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQ_xWvX1n9g|Line Goes Up]]. Jan. 2022, 140 Minuten
 Afternoon: Beyond NFTs, there are DAOs
 Catlow, Ruth, and Penny Rafferty, eds. 2022. Radical Friends: Decentralised Autonomous Organisations and the Arts. United Kingdom: Torque Editions.
 Read: Introduction. What is Radical Friendship made of? 26-46