Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- art_and_the_paradoxes_of_copyright [2024/10/14 13:59] – [Monday: Basics of Copyright Law & Edge Cases] fstalder
+++ art_and_the_paradoxes_of_copyright [2025/02/13 13:28] (current) – [Tuesday: Aesthetics, Authorship and counter-movements] fstalder@zhdk.ch
@@ Line 42: / Line 42: @@
 Art. 11: Der Urheber oder die Urheberin hat das ausschliessliche Recht zu bestimmen; (a) ob, wann und wie das Werk geändert werden darf.
+Afternoon
 Defining the edges of copyright:
@@ Line 49: / Line 51: @@
   * [[http://relevancy.bger.ch/php/clir/http/index.php?highlight_docid=atf%3A%2F%2F130-III-714%3Ade&lang=de&type=show_document| Bundesgrichtsurteil: Gisela Blau Guggenheim vs BBC]], 19. April 2004
   * [[http://42mm.ch/urheberrechtsgesetz-lichtbildschutz-in-kraft|Lichtbildschutz]], URG Revision, 1. April 2020 (Artikel 2 Abs. 3bis)
-Afternoon
@@ Line 82: / Line 82: @@
 Morning
+Ortland, Eberhard. 2008. “The Aesthetics of Copyright:” In Proceedings of the XXII World Congress of Philosophy, 227–32. Philosophy Documentation Center. https://doi.org/10.5840/wcp22200811225 {{ ::ortland_aesthetics_of_copyright_wcp_2008_.pdf |PDF}}
+Stalder, Felix. 2014. “[[https://www.kunstbulletin.ch/de/magazin/kunstbulletin-1-22014/urheberrecht-wenn-das-recht-kunstfeindlich-wird|Urheberrecht - Wenn das Recht kunstfeindlich wird.]]” Kunstbulletin, 2014. {{ :stalder_uhr_2014.pdf |PDF}}
 Barthes, Roland. 1967. “The Death of the Author.” Aspen, 1967.
 https://www.ubu.com/aspen/aspen5and6/index.html
-Foucault, Michel. 1998. “What Is an Author.” In Aesthetics, Method, and Epistemology, edited by James D. Faubion, 205–22. Essential Works of Foucault 1954-1984, Vol. 2. New York: New Press. https://www.sas.upenn.edu/~cavitch/pdf-library/Foucault_Author.pdf
+Foucault, Michel. 1968. “What Is an Author?” {{ ::foucault_what_is_an_author.pdf | PDF}}
-Ortland, Eberhard. 2008. “The Aesthetics of Copyright:” In Proceedings of the XXII World Congress of Philosophy, 227–32. Philosophy Documentation Center. https://doi.org/10.5840/wcp22200811225 {{ ::ortland_aesthetics_of_copyright_wcp_2008_.pdf |PDF}}
-Stalder, Felix. 2014. “[[https://www.artlog.net/de/kunstbulletin-1-2-2014/urheberrecht-wenn-das-recht-kunstfeindlich-wird|Urheberrecht - Wenn das Recht kunstfeindlich wird.]]” Kunstbulletin, 2014.
 [[https://kunstfreiheit.ch/serendipity/|Kunstfreiheit.ch]]
@@ Line 101: / Line 102: @@
-Launey, Aude. [[https://aksioma.org/pdf/aksioma_PostScriptUM_34_ENG_launay.pdf|The Return of the Dead Author]]. PostScript UM 34. Ljubljana: Aksioma – Institute for Contemporary Art, 2020
+Gibson, Johanna. „Page against the machine: the death of the author and the rise of the producer?//“ Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property// 13, Nr. 3 (12. Oktober 2023): 275–84. https://doi.org/10.4337/qmjip.2023.03.00.
@@ Line 108: / Line 110: @@
-Free Software Foundation. [[https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html|What is Free Software]]
+Free Software Foundation. [[https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html|What is Free Software?]]
 [[https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.en.html|GNU General Public License]]
+[[https://creativecommons.org|CreativeCommons]]
 **Digital Commons**
-[[https://creatingcommons.org|Creating Commons]]
+[[https://creatingcommons.zhdk.ch|Creating Commons]]
 Dulong de Rosnay, Melanie, und Felix Stalder. „[[https://doi.org/10.14763/2020.4.1530|Digital Commons“]]. Internet Policy Review 9, Nr. 4 (2020).
@@ Line 138: / Line 142: @@
 [[http://www.artnet.com/artists/sturtevant/|Artnet Entry]]
-[[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KOi1b4EEpvU|Introduction to Elaine Sturtevant]], The Museum of Contemporary Art, 2015, 9 Min
+[[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KOi1b4EEpvU|Introduction to Elaine Sturtevant]], The Museum of Contemporary Art, 2015, 3 Min
 “Hans-Ulrich Obrist in Conversation with Elaine Sturtevant.” 2008. https://032c.com/magazine/elaine-sturtevant
@@ Line 176: / Line 180: @@
   * [[https://hyperallergic.com/351403/richard-prince-disowns-his-ivanka-trump-portrait-possibly-increasing-its-value/|Richard Prince Disowns His Ivanka Trump Portrait, Possibly Increasing Its Value]]. Hyperallergic, Jan. 2017
+Harrison, Nate. „[[https://web.archive.org/web/20170606051657/http://www.artandeducation.net/paper/the-pictures-generation-the-copyright-act-of-1976-and-the-reassertion-of-authorship-in-postmodernity/|The Pictures Generation, the Copyright Act of 1976, and the Reassertion of Authorship in Postmodernity]]“. Art & Education (blog), 2012. (archive.org) {{ ::the_pictures_generation_the_copyright_act_of_1976_and_the_reassertion_of_authorship_in_postmodernity_art_education.pdf |PDF}}
-Harrison, Nate. 2015. “[[https://americansuburbx.com/2015/06/in-the-wake-of-richard-prince-and-instagram-revisiting-copyright-law-appropriation-and-history.html|In The Wake of Richard Prince and Instagram, Revisiting Copyright Law, Appropriation and History.]]” AMERICAN SUBURB X (blog). June 4, 2015. [[https://web.archive.org/web/20120701012619/http://www.artandeducation.net/paper/the-pictures-generation-the-copyright-act-of-1976-and-the-reassertion-of-authorship-in-postmodernity|Initial publication, with footnotes]] 2012 via Waybackmachine
+Nate Harrison [[https://www.nkhstudio.com/amen|Can I Get An Amen?]], 2004
-Nate Harrison [[https://nkhstudio.com/pages/popup_amen.html|Can I Get An Amen?]], 2004
@@ Line 190: / Line 194: @@
 Replicas. Originality on Trial in and around Olivier Mosset’s Collection. 30.06 –29.10.2017. Musée Des Beaux-Arts, La Chaux-De-Fonds. [[http://www2.chaux-de-fonds.ch/musees/mba/mba-expositions/mba-a-avenir/Documents/MBA_GUIDE_DE_VISITE_REPLIQUES.pdf|Catalogue]]
+**-- Additional Artists we talked about ---**
+JSG Boggs drawing money: Piepenbring, Dan. „[[https://www.theparisreview.org/blog/2017/02/01/j-s-g-boggs-1955-2017|One Fundred Dollars]]“. The Paris Review (blog), 1. Februar 2017.
+Zaal, Reindert van der. „[[https://mediareport.nl/press-law/05052011/legal-review-plesner-vs-louis-vuitton-judgment-important-victory-for-the-artistic-freedom/?lang=en|Legal Review Plesner vs. Louis Vuitton Judgment: Artistic Freedom Prevails Over IP-Rights]]“. Mediareport (blog), 5. Mai 2011. .
 ===== Thursday: Paradoxes of machine creativity =====
 **Cornelia Sollfrank and the net-art Generator**
-Guest: Cornelia Sollfrank (via Zoom)
 [[https://net.art-generator.com/index.html|Net.Art Generator]]
@@ Line 203: / Line 211: @@
 Patricia Caulfield [[https://nazmiyalantiquerugs.com/blog/andy-warhol-flowers-patricia-caulfield-hibiscus-blossoms/|Hibiscus Blossoms]] (1964) -- Andy Warhol [[https://www.moma.org/collection/works/71491|Flowers]] (1964) -- Elaine Sturtevant [[https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/15/t-magazine/most-important-contemporary-art.html|Warhol Flowers]] (1967) -- Cornelia Sollfrank.[[https://www.katevassgalerie.com/print?category=Cornelia%20Sollfrank| Anonymous Warhol Flowers]] (2004 -). [[https://nftnetart.officeimpart.com/exhibit/og-flowers|OG flowers]] (2010-2021).
-[[https://artwarez.org/21.0.html|Legal Perspective]], 2004
+[[https://artwarez.org/projects/legalperspective/|Legal Perspective]], 2004
 [[https://ubu.com/film/sollfrank_warhol.html|I don't know]], 1968/2006
+[[https://www.katevassgalerie.com/cornelia-sollfrank| Kate Vass, Gallery Zurich]]
 **Readings Net.Art Generator:**
@@ Line 248: / Line 258: @@
 https://haveibeentrained.com
+[[https://pad.vmk.zhdk.ch/paradoxes_of_copyright_further_refs|Further references]] (Pad)