what_kind_of_ai_do_we_want._generative_ai_and_normalization

“Liberate the possible from the tyranny of the probable.” (Dan McQuillan, Goldsmith University)

About:

In this module, we will combine theoretical and technical/practical approaches to AI, trying to develop a critical perspective and some hands-on experience at the same time. Our starting point is to consider «Artificial Intelligence» (AI) as a historical-material practice, that is, shaped by the concrete conditions of its development and use.

In particular, we want to look at the issue of “normalization”, the tendency of generative AI to create very similar-looking content, drawn from a relatively narrow range of possibilities.

Thus, we will look at contemporary artistic practices, read key texts to contextualize the development of AI within techno-capitalism, and have with guests who introduce us to the technologies that make AI appear intelligent and discuss their own (artistic) practices.

Date, Times, Location: Mo 04.03. - Fr 08.03., 09:15 -17:00, Room ZT 6.K04

PAD for Notes and References

“Introduction to Machine Learning”:

Guest: Alexandre Puttick (Latent Spaces Reserch Projekt).

Understanding the Latent Space: Basic mathematical operations. Slides

Playing a Game: Semantle.com

The Issue of Normalization

Sources of Normalization

Guest: Eva Cetinic: Critical Perspectives on Generative AI: An Overview of Main Topics

This lecture will provide an overview of some of the recurring topics in the critical analysis of contemporary generative AI technologies. With a particular focus on generative text-to-image models, we will discuss some of the most frequently addressed themes in the critical reading of those models, such as bias and stereotypes; data laundering; limitations of prompting; authorship and anthropomorphization; impact on creative and media industries; aesthetic homogenization; etc. The goal of this lecture is to foster a deeper understanding of these topics and stimulate a discussion on the implications, constrains and opportunities that these problematic aspects of generative AI provide in the context of art and creativity.

Morning

Colonialism / Post-colonialism

Historical Process (1492-1974)

https://brilliantmaps.com/colonialism-history

System of Dispossession

“Colonialism = Thingification” (Aimé Césaire, Discourse on Colonialism)

Digital Colonialism

De-colonizing AI

11:30 - 13:00 Nora Al Bardi (via Zoom)

Afternoon

Denormalization: The strange case of LOAB

Negative Weighted Prompts

Non-Normal Speech

Experiments with animal voices https://latentspaces.zhdk.ch/birdbot/

Waldrapp Field Recordings https://xeno-canto.org/361510

Voice Cloning https://replicate.com/afiaka87/tortoise-tts

Morning:

80% happy:Computer and Emotions

Paul Eckmann Universal Facial Expressions

  • Anger
  • Disgust
  • Fear
  • Happiness
  • Sadness
  • Surprise
  • (neutral)

Monda Lisa's Smile

Wikipedia Emotion Classification

Content analysis vs. behavioral analysis (involuntary facial expressions, gait, typing, biometric data…)

Crawford, Kate. Atlas of AI: power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2021.Chapter 5: Affect

OBJECTIVE OR BIASED On the questionable use of Artificial Intelligence for job applications, 02.2021

Afternoon: 13:30 -16:30 RAUM: ZT 1.D07 Probebühne

Guest: Manuel Hendry & the angry chatbot

→ 16:30 Cory Arcangel's Presentation (see pad)

Morning

Individual Work on de-normalized generation.

Possibility of personal “mentorat”

Afternoon

One more game to play

Sharing of images and strategies

Round of Feedback

More refs:

Sanela Jahić. NO TO AI, YES TO A NON-FASCIST APPARATUS (2023)

https://sanelajahic.com/works/no-to-ai-yes-to-a-non-fascist-apparatus/

  • what_kind_of_ai_do_we_want._generative_ai_and_normalization.txt
  • Last modified: 2024/09/10 10:18
  • by fstalder